By Michael D. Evans
Most of us belong to one or more listservs. And it is not uncommon to get somewhat annoyed by the arguments, misinformation and sometimes sheer nonsense that seems to populate many of them. On that rare occasion, however, a truly engaging and informative discussion surfaces. Some Fresnans were fortunate to have been part of such a discussion on the relevance of voting.
On the Occupy Fresno listserv, Kit Williams recently posted a link to a video (www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YR4CseY9pk) of comedian Russell Brand being interviewed by Jeremy Paxman, a British journalist, broadcaster and author. In that interview, Brand reveals a number of interesting political viewpoints, one of which is that people should not vote. Williams kick-started the discussion by responding about the video, āIām still pondering [Brandās] ideas about voting.ā From the Occupy Fresno listserv, the discussion was picked up by the Central Valley Progressive PAC listserv and continued on two threads.
The discussion evolved into a number of related areas, including citizen participation, the two-party structure, the economic system, even revolution, but kept its intellectual resonance, for the most part. A sampling of the viewpoints appears below:
āI must be honest; I really doubt that any of my votes did anything except make me feel less guilty than I would if I didnāt vote,ā says Jim Compton-Schmidt.
āI donāt consider voting meaningless,ā notes Gerry Bill. āI never miss an election.ā Furthermore, Bill states that he is āhard pressed to think of any significant social change that has come about by simply not voting.ā
āI agree that people should vote, but would not automatically say that those who do not vote have no say,ā says Mike Bridges. āA non-vote, if not done out of complete ignorance and apathy, can also be a āvote of no confidence.āā
āIām afraid to not vote,ā says Williams. āThe only way it makes sense to meā¦.is if abstaining from voting leads to things getting so bad that people will finally hit the streets, and weāll have a full-blown revolution.ā
Catherine Steele states that ārefusing to participate is great if everyone is refusing, however, until people are ready to stand together to throw off those old comfortable ways, it is a waste of energy and plays into the hands of the āworst of the two evils.āā
Howard Watkins intones that āif you do not vote, the Tea Party wins. Do you want [Nancy] Pelosi or [John] Boehner as Speaker of the House? Do you want Ted Cruz or Hillary Clinton appointing our next Supreme Court justices? If you do not care, do not complain about our government. If you do care, then help elect the best candidates possibleāhere and across the country.ā
āI did vote against Measure G [Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearenginās attempt to privatize residential waste service], by the way,ā says Bill, āone of those votes that I think did make a difference. How would my staying at home have helped our sanitation workers?ā
Addressing the practicality of voting, Watkins states that āin 2014, we have the best opportunity to bring a progressive majority to both the Fresno City Council and the Fresno County Board of Supervisors. Staying united like we did to defeat Measure G will be the key.ā
āLinked to this discussion of strategy is the question,ā notes Yez Kaoosji, āwhen elected, what will the person do? Once on the job, the job of keeping the elected official accountable becomes the job of a vigilant electorate.ā
āI donāt think the question of voting or not belongs on an Occupy list,ā according to Michael Becker, āOccupy was valuable precisely to the extent that people began, if even for a moment, to think about a world in which we do not give our power over to bosses, bankers and certainly not to their political whores in the two evil partiesā¦Itās trueā¦that this refusal needs to become universal.ā
āIād be more convinced [of the need to vote]ā¦if you could provide examples of how things are better, of how āitās working,āā declares Williams. āWeāre on the verge of losing our planet, fracking is going ahead full-steam (or close to it), racism continues, the two parties are both in the corporationsā pockets, Citizens United is about to be made even more powerful by the pending McCutcheon v. FEC case thatās awaiting a decision from SCOTUS, weāre at war with so many countries I canāt count them, Medicare and Social Security are threatened by both parties, we have no proportional representation, and the list goes on.ā
āBy itself, voting is pretty meaningless,ā says Chip Ashley. āBy itself, voting is uninformed. Informed voting, on the other hand, implies voting in connection with the more important activities of involvement in the political, social and environmental discourse, including protest and civil disobedience.ā
āFor voting to truly make a difference, we need revolutionary candidates, not just progressives,ā asserts Bridges.
āI say vote, but donāt stop there,ā states Bill. āWhat you do between election days is more important than what you do on Election Day.ā
āWe need frictionālots of itābut we also need voting,ā says Ashley. āSo get out in the street and then go to the polls.ā
āI do not advocate voting or not voting, thatās a personal choice,ā says Matt Duris. āBut if your goal is a complete overhaul of a system, in other words a revolution, piecemeal reform, which is what voting achieves, doesnāt really help achieve that end.ā
That led to a brief discussion of direct democracy and participation regardless of the system.
āAt least with direct democracy, you spend all of your time talking about issues, rather than polls and strategies, candidate campaigns, etc.,ā says Bridges. āOur government does not know how to govern, or more accurately, does not care about the people. At least with direct democracy, the burden is squarely on the people.ā
āDirect democracy might actually work if most people were honest and good and as concerned about others as about themselves,ā Ashley said. āProblem is, there are too many manipulative psychopaths among us for direct democracy to work. Heck, thatās the reason representative democracy doesnāt work well.ā
Even so, says Ashley, āParticipating is a great deal more important than voting. Voting is just a small part of the picture.ā
āI think the burden of proof is on those who want to sustain this system,ā says Becker. āProve to those of us who donāt that this system can ever produce anything remotely resembling āequality,ā āfreedom,ā āhuman dignity,ā āself-respect,ā āecological balance,ā ācompassionā and ātoleration.ā I am for all of those things, which is why I am for anarchy. Anything else is some form of coercive hierarchy in the interests of those with coercive power.
āObviously, voting is how this system works,ā adds Becker. āAs Emma Goldman said, āif voting changed anything, theyād make it illegal.āā
āLetās not forget that the powers arrayed against the values most on this thread purport to share do everything they can to discourage voting,ā responds Ashley. āHence the efforts of the Republican Party going on at this moment to suppress the vote in the Southern states.ā
Compton-Schmidt says, āAny group of people interested in āchangeā needs to welcome a right wing, a left wing and a center of that group and needs to listen to all views as we all prepare to move forward with the changes and do the actions that are called for.ā
A number of submissions dealt with the burden of our current economic system.
āCapitalism is the root of the problem,ā asserts Becker.
āI do not believe that capitalism is democracy,ā says Lydia Flores. āI believe that government exists to protect the people from exploitation.ā
āIām pretty well anti-capitalist and willing to work with others to bring about change on that front,ā says Ashley. āThis includes organizing, lobbying, fractionating, civil disobedience and voting. We need to work together.ā
āMy pragmatic nature goes so far to the Howard Watkins plan (do it locally, but do it well this time),ā concludes Nancy Waidtlow. āI would just add that in my recent experience being around the homeless, they have survival on their minds, not revolution.ā
Perhaps Compton-Schmidt sums up the discussion best: āI cannot believe that this string has turned out sooooo beautiful and that people seem willing to become vulnerable in a big way.ā
(*Authorās note: A number of people participated in the above discussion, not all of whom are quoted herein. Personsā names are used without any title or designation as their preference for such designation might differ from what the author might have noted.)
*****
Michael D. Evans is a political activist, editor and writer. Contact him at evansm@usa.net.